Zachary Taylor – A Whig? Lincoln in New England Article

As the process for rolling out my new book, Lincoln in New England: In Search of His Forgotten Tours, continues, I’ve been busy writing shorter articles for various venues. One of them is the For the People newsletter of the Abraham Lincoln Association based in Springfield, Illinois. I wrote about why the selection of Zachary Taylor as the Whig nominee for president in 1848 was, let’s say, problematic. Here is the article as published (continues on the bottom of the second page):

ALA For the People article p1

 

ALA For the People article p2

I have also written articles that will appear in forthcoming issues of the Lincoln Forum Bulletin, the Lincoln Herald, the Lincolnian, and other venues. Plus, I have commitments for several more to appear in 2026.

Meanwhile, I’m scheduling presentations and interviews for around the time the book comes out in March 2026, so feel free to contact me if you would like me to speak to your organization, either in person or via Zoom.

Lincoln in New England book cover

Coming in March 2026: Lincoln in New England: In Search of His Forgotten Tours

Also see – Lincoln: The Fire of Genius: How Abraham Lincoln’s Commitment to Science and Technology Helped Modernize America.

Join me on Goodreads, the database where I keep track of my reading. Please leave a review on Goodreads and Amazon if you like the book.

You also follow my author page on Facebook and on Instagram.

David J. Kent is Immediate Past President of the Lincoln Group of DC and the author of Lincoln: The Fire of Genius: How Abraham Lincoln’s Commitment to Science and Technology Helped Modernize America and Lincoln: The Man Who Saved America.

His previous books include Tesla: The Wizard of Electricity and Edison: The Inventor of the Modern World and two specialty e-books: Nikola Tesla: Renewable Energy Ahead of Its Time and Abraham Lincoln and Nikola Tesla: Connected by Fate.

Abraham Lincoln Declares “No Kings” For America

Mathew Brady, February 27, 1860, Public Domain, Wikimedia CommonsAbraham Lincoln often warned about the dangers of allowing certain Americans to act as “kings.” Lincoln harkened back to the Declaration of Independence and its self-evident truths “that all men are created equal” and endowed “with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” It was on this basis that the united colonies declared their separation from Britain. After the soaring preamble, the remainder of the document is a list of grievances against the British King.

One of the grievances included by Thomas Jefferson in the draft – but removed from the final declaration due to resistance among the biggest slave-holding powers – blamed King George of waging “cruel war against human nature itself” by introducing slavery onto American soil. It was one of many complaints against the rule of Kings. In his Peoria speech, Lincoln noted about slavery that the Founders “found the institution existing among us, which they could not help; and they cast blame upon the British King for having permitted its introduction.” They still couldn’t eradicate slavery completely by the time of the Constitution but took steps to put it on a path toward its ultimate extinction. Unfortunately for them, the invention of the cotton gin and expansion of the new nation’s land area resulted in the opposite, substantial growth in slavery.

In the famous Lincoln-Douglas Debates of 1858, when Lincoln was running against Stephen A. Douglas for a US Senate seat, Lincoln again raised the issue of democracy versus “the divine right of kings.” When forcefully noting that slavery was wrong, Lincoln said:

“That is the real issue. That is the issue that will continue in this country when these poor tongues of Judge Douglas and myself shall be silent. It is the eternal struggle between these two principles—right and wrong—throughout the world. They are the two principles that have stood face to face from the beginning of time; and will ever continue to struggle. The one is the common right of humanity and the other the divine right of kings. It is the same principle in whatever shape it develops itself. It is the same spirit that says, “You work and toil and earn bread, and I’ll eat it.” No matter in what shape it comes, whether from the mouth of a king who seeks to bestride the people of his own nation and live by the fruit of their labor, or from one race of men as an apology for enslaving another race, it is the same tyrannical principle.

It is the duty of all Americans to stand up for the democratic principles that made this country great. We must assure that the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution protect ALL Americans.

 

[Photo Mathew Brady, February 27, 1860, Public Domain, Wikimedia Commons]

Lincoln in New England book cover

Coming in March 2026: Lincoln in New England: In Search of His Forgotten Tours

Also see – Lincoln: The Fire of Genius: How Abraham Lincoln’s Commitment to Science and Technology Helped Modernize America.

Join me on Goodreads, the database where I keep track of my reading. Please leave a review on Goodreads and Amazon if you like the book.

You also follow my author page on Facebook. Also follow me on Instagram.

David J. Kent is Immediate Past President of the Lincoln Group of DC and the author of Lincoln: The Fire of Genius: How Abraham Lincoln’s Commitment to Science and Technology Helped Modernize America and Lincoln: The Man Who Saved America.

His previous books include Tesla: The Wizard of Electricity and Edison: The Inventor of the Modern World and two specialty e-books: Nikola Tesla: Renewable Energy Ahead of Its Time and Abraham Lincoln and Nikola Tesla: Connected by Fate.

 

 

 

 

Lincoln Embraces the Declaration of Independence

By German, Christopher S. - Library of Congress, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=25149728Abraham Lincoln made his way to Washington, D.C. by a roundabout rail route in February 1861. Among his many stops was the city of Philadelphia, where on George Washington’s birthday he raised the American flag at Independence Hall. Lincoln acknowledged the import of the spot where the Declaration of Independence was signed:

“I am filled with deep emotion at finding myself standing here in the place where were collected together the wisdom, the patriotism, the devotion to principle, from which sprang the institutions under which we live.”

He also understood the import of the task that had fallen to him as the president-elect. Seven southern states had seceded from the Union, violating the intent of the Declaration and the Constitution that implemented its guiding principle. Lincoln embraced the Declaration and its aspirational words that “all men are created equal” and endowed with unalienable rights, including “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” Lincoln stated clearly:

“I can say…that all the political sentiments I entertain have been drawn…from the sentiments which originated, and were given to the world from this hall in which we stand. I have never had a feeling politically that did not spring from the sentiments embodied in the Declaration of Independence.”

Lincoln knew that the Declaration was more than “the mere matter of the separation of the colonies from the mother land.” It was that the Declaration’s ideal of “giving liberty not alone to the people of this country, but hope to the world for all future time.” He added, “It was that which gave promise that in due time the weights should be lifted from the shoulders of all men, and that all should have an equal chance. This is the sentiment embodied in that Declaration of Independence.”

At the time of the Declaration, it’s ideal that “all men are created equal” was still an aspiration. With a large percentage of the population held in bound servitude against their will, Lincoln understood what the Founders had understood, that much work had to be done to achieve a more perfect Union. It would pass to Lincoln to finally remove the stain of slavery from our midst.

But there is a deeper, darker, knowledge that influenced Lincoln’s words that day in Philadelphia. Not only had several states split the Union already, but there was a plot to kill Lincoln even before he had a chance to be inaugurated in as president, never mind take any action the South found objectionable. An assassination plot had been uncovered. Southern sympathizers in Baltimore planned to murder Lincoln as he passed through the city on his way to Washington. In Philadelphia, Lincoln again pointed to the Declaration as the sustaining guidance to the nation and to him.

“Now, my friends, can this country be saved upon that basis [all men having an equal chance]? If it can, I will consider myself one of the happiest men in the world if I can help to save it. If it can’t be saved upon that principle, it will be truly awful. But, if this country cannot be saved without giving up that principle—I was about to say I would rather be assassinated on this spot than to surrender it.”

Now, in my view of the present aspect of affairs, there is no need of bloodshed and war. There is no necessity for it. I am not in favor of such a course, and I may say in advance, there will be no blood shed unless it be forced upon the Government. The Government will not use force unless force is used against it.” (Prolonged applause and cries of “That’s the proper sentiment.”)

As I write this the nation is in the midst of another existential crisis, this one the reverse of what Lincoln had noted. We, the people, must stand for the ideals set forth in the Declaration of Independence and apply the Constitution to ALL Americans.

[Photo by German, Christopher S. – Library of Congress, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=25149728]

Lincoln in New England book cover

Coming in March 2026: Lincoln in New England: In Search of His Forgotten Tours

Also see – Lincoln: The Fire of Genius: How Abraham Lincoln’s Commitment to Science and Technology Helped Modernize America.

Join me on Goodreads, the database where I keep track of my reading. Please leave a review on Goodreads and Amazon if you like the book.

You also follow my author page on Facebook. Also follow me on Instagram.

David J. Kent is Immediate Past President of the Lincoln Group of DC and the author of Lincoln: The Fire of Genius: How Abraham Lincoln’s Commitment to Science and Technology Helped Modernize America and Lincoln: The Man Who Saved America.

His previous books include Tesla: The Wizard of Electricity and Edison: The Inventor of the Modern World and two specialty e-books: Nikola Tesla: Renewable Energy Ahead of Its Time and Abraham Lincoln and Nikola Tesla: Connected by Fate.

When Lincoln Spoke at Tremont Temple in Boston

Tremont Temple Baptist Church, Boston. Kenneth C. Zirkel Wikimedia Commons

Tremont Temple Baptist Church, Boston, Massachusetts

Congressman Abraham Lincoln traveled to Massachusetts in 1848 to campaign for Zachary Taylor. The last stop on his two-week itinerary was Tremont Temple in Boston. There he would meet the man who became his most important political collaborator – and rival – William Seward. I thought of the Tremont Temple recently after seeing an article about it undergoing major renovations with the help of some former inmates.

Notwithstanding its name and the building’s facade, the Temple is actually a Baptist Church. In retrospect, the Tremont Temple was a perfect location to boost Lincoln’s awareness of the growing importance of slavery to our national survival. Formed a decade before as the Free Baptist Church, it was the first integrated church in America. I visited the current building during my travels for Lincoln in New England. which was an enlarged rebuild following a series of fires in the years since Lincoln’s visit. The façade reminds me more of a Jewish Temple, but it remains the Tremont Temple Baptist Church. It was one of the first churches in America to be racially integrated. Back in 1838, an abolitionist and deacon named Timothy Gilbert, angry that his church, Charles Street Baptist, barred African Americans from sitting in the main sanctuary. forced the issue by bringing a black friend along to his pew. After the inevitable fight with church leaders, Gilbert left and started a new congregation. It grew quickly as antislavery sentiment grew in Boston, soon hosting speeches by abolitionists like William Lloyd Garrison and Frederick Douglass.

For the Whig event in 1848, the Boston Atlas listed the speakers as William Seward (the keynote), “Abram Lincoln” (despite inviting him as a sitting congressman, the papers still could not get the spelling of his name right), textile industrialist Abbott Lawrence, and Richard Fletcher (former congressman and first president of the American Statistical Association formed in Boston).

The event almost didn’t happen. Lincoln had been in Massachusetts trying to coax a runaway Whig faction called the Free Soilers to stay within the party. The Free Soil people, knowing that the Whigs were planning a huge political meeting, had rented out all the available meeting spaces. That forced the Whigs to schedule their rally for outside in Court Square between the old city hall and the courthouse. Then a deluge hit, with heavy rain making it impossible to hold a rally outside. Luckily, a Dr. Cotton released his hold on the Tremont Temple, a half block across the street from where Lincoln was staying.

Lincoln, who spoke after Seward, by now had become accustomed to his standard talking points attempting to explain why Zachary Taylor, “a man who owns…two hundred men, women, and children,” (as the Democratic-leaning Boston Post put it), was the best person to fight the “slaveocracy.” This was his last speech on the Massachusetts trip, and he was less about trying out new material than absorbing new insights for the future. Nathaniel Hawthorne later described Lincoln as having “an unmistakably Yankee look” that James Schouler thought made him seem “kinsman” to eastern men unfamiliar with Lincoln’s “fifey and shrill” voice. But at this point in his political life, Lincoln was largely unknown in the East and was treated more as a “prime example of a Sucker Whig,” that is, an entertaining hick from the west who told funny stories.

William Henry Seward, on the other hand, was already an accomplished lawyer, a former state legislator, a former New York governor, and about to be elected U.S. Senator. He was an established Whig leader and a vocal opponent of slavery, which was why he was the headliner for the evening. The comparison of the ungainly westerner with his odd southern-western drawl and unmanageable hair against Seward’s erudite eastern formality and stiffness must have been profoundly amusing to the largely learned Boston elite. Whereas Lincoln was forced to argue the inconsistency of Taylor’s Whig credentials, Seward spoke in loftier terms of “providence” and not “bow[ing] before the aristocracy of the South,” which a splinter vote for the Free Soil third party would assure. Seward argued that “all Whigs agree – that Slavery shall not be extended into any territory now free – and they are doubtless willing to go one step further – that it shall be abolished where it now exists under the immediate protection of the General Government.” He “believed in the force of moral power” and that “the time would come…when the free people would free the slaves in this country. That night in the Tremont Temple climaxed with the admittedly partisan crowd giving three hearty cheers for “Old Zach,” three more for Governor Seward, and three more for Mr. Lincoln, according to the Atlas.

While the Atlas lauded Lincoln’s speech as “powerful and convincing…which was cheered to the echo, Seward seemed less impressed. Two decades later, after the Civil War and Lincoln’s life had ended, Francis Carpenter reported Seward’s recollection of that night. In Seward’s memory, Lincoln gave a “rambling, story-telling speech, putting the audience in good humor, but avoiding any extended discussion of the slavery question.” Then there was the story that Lincoln told Seward the day after his 1848 remarks: “I have been thinking about what you said in your speech. I reckon you are right. We have got to deal with this slavery question and got to give much more attention to it hereafter than we have been doing.” Whether that conversation ever happened is debatable, but the visit did give Lincoln a lot to think about.

Now in 2025, Tremont Temple Baptist Church is getting a much-needed makeover, readying the current building for the attention it will receive next year when the nation celebrates its 250th anniversary and the Declaration of Independence. Lincoln was a huge proponent of the Declaration as an aspirational lodestar for the country. In fact, one of the places I write is for Lincoln250.org, a source for information about Lincoln’s admiration for the Declaration of Independence. Check it out.

[Adapted from Lincoln in New England: In Search of His Forgotten Tours, due for release on March 3, 2026]

[Photo of front of Tremont Temple in 2024, Kenneth C. Zirkel, Wikimedia Commons Public Domain]

Lincoln in New England book cover

Coming in March 2026: Lincoln in New England: In Search of His Forgotten Tours

Also see – Lincoln: The Fire of Genius: How Abraham Lincoln’s Commitment to Science and Technology Helped Modernize America.

Join me on Goodreads, the database where I keep track of my reading. Please leave a review on Goodreads and Amazon if you like the book.

You also follow my author page on Facebook. Also follow me on Instagram.

David J. Kent is Immediate Past President of the Lincoln Group of DC and the author of Lincoln: The Fire of Genius: How Abraham Lincoln’s Commitment to Science and Technology Helped Modernize America and Lincoln: The Man Who Saved America.

His previous books include Tesla: The Wizard of Electricity and Edison: The Inventor of the Modern World and two specialty e-books: Nikola Tesla: Renewable Energy Ahead of Its Time and Abraham Lincoln and Nikola Tesla: Connected by Fate.